"I cannot stand it when he belittles me, but if I walk away he'll get mad at me."
Everyone has his own personal rules or standards for effective communication, whether conscious of them or not. If you are not aware of or comfortable with your standards, you cannot take a stand or have your stand respected. Consequently effective communication becomes difficult or impossible. Often, two people attempt to communicate without clearly defined and mutually agreed upon rules. Therefore they inadvertently risk stepping on each other's toes or, at the least, communicating ineffectively.
Example: The first time Curtis and Catherine came to my office, Catherine explained at length and in great detail about the communication problems they were having. Curtis hardly said a word. Finally, when I asked for his opinion, he began to explain, "If I say something she does not like, she mouths off--." She quickly interjected, "I may mouth off at times, but his mouth is always off."
As you and your companion clarify and agree on the basic rules for effective communication (the Three Rules For Good Communication), a common barrier to effective communication is removed.
Example: As Lee struggled to recall times when he and Joyce were not arguing or avoiding each other, he discovered some interesting things. First, there actually were times when they got along better. Second, he came up with some things he could do differently to communicate better. Third, he began to feel more hopeful.
Example: Walter was accustomed to telling Carol what he thought she "should" or "shouldn't" do. In his mind, there was nothing disrespectful or unkind about his language. Carol, however, interpreted words like "should," "must," "cannot," and "have to," as coercive. It was not a matter of who was right. The important fact is that effective communication can only occur when both agree they are being treated kindly.
Solution: Either Walter uses different words ("I prefer" rather than, "You should") or Carol can remind herself his use of the word "Should" is not intended to be demanding or coercive.
Remember: As long as you are not trying to control him, any feelings he may have to the contrary do not change the facts.
Note: Differences are more likely to reflect different points of view toward the same thing rather than fundamental differences. One person may provide a long, highly detailed list while the other provides a short, concise list covering the most important points. If you discover major differences that cannot be resolved in a mutually satisfactory manner, consider seeking professional help. (See How To Select A Therapist.)
Result: Calling time-out will be defined as an act of love rather than rejection or avoidance. Before you know it, you will both fit like a "T."
Example:
Ron: "Your voice seems to be getting a little loud. I think we're getting outside of the `Three Rules.'"
Kathy: "You are right, I 'm sorry."
Conversation continues.
Example:
Georgia: "I get the feeling you are trying to make me agree with you."
Mike: "You know I am right when it comes to disciplining the children."
Georgia (Time Out signal): "Mike, I love you and look forward to discussing this matter when we both can be more open-minded." Georgia then politely left the room, even though Mike wanted to continue the "discussion."
Result: Whether or not your companion agrees with your methods, you will eliminate arguments.
Important: Do not forget to follow up on any postponed discussions at a later time.
With patience and practice, you will find it easier and easier to communicate by the rules you have set.
GO TO:
Next
barrier: Difficulty distinquishing thoughts and feelings from
facts
Communication
chapter: Introduction
Table
of contents
Previous
chapter: Central principles
Next
chapter: Depression
Dr.
Fishbein's Home Page